Mintos vs Twino — Which Is Better in 2026?

Mintos and Twino are both Latvian platforms, both hold investment firm licenses, and both have been around since 2015. On paper, they look like siblings. In reality, they’re at completely different stages of their evolution in 2026.

Mintos is the market leader — EUR 12 billion+ in funded loans, 700,000+ investors, 60+ loan originators across 33 countries, and a pending banking license application. Twino, by contrast, has spent the last few years cleaning up messes. The Russia-Ukraine war froze millions in investor funds, its Vietnam operation defaulted, its real estate arm (Twino Ventures) is being wound down, and the platform is now almost entirely dependent on one country: Poland.

I’ve invested on both for years. Over EUR 150,000 on Mintos since 2017, and a smaller allocation on Twino since its early days. My experience mirrors the data — Mintos has been the steadier ride.

The short version: Mintos is the clear leader in almost every dimension — diversification, regulation, features, and scale. Twino offers competitive returns (~12%) on Polish consumer loans and genuine MiFID II oversight, but the single-country concentration and recent track record of operational problems make it a cautious allocation at best.

Quick Comparison: Mintos vs Twino

Returns and Performance

Both platforms currently advertise similar headline returns around 12%. But the stories behind those numbers are very different.

On Mintos, my personal average over nine years has been around 9% net annually. That factors in the good years (11-12% early on), the COVID disruption in 2020, and the Russian loan originator defaults in 2022, which left about EUR 130 million in unresolved claims across the platform. It’s a realistic long-term number for a diversified investor who stuck through the rough patches. The 12% headline figure reflects current available rates, not a guaranteed long-term outcome.

Twino’s current 12% rate applies specifically to Polish consumer loan securities originated by Fincard. In the platform’s earlier years, returns were solid at 9%+ with zero defaults in my portfolio. But the Russia crisis, the Vietnam default (EUR 1.6 million likely lost), and the Ventures wind-down have eroded the overall picture for longer-term investors.

The key difference is that Mintos gives you the tools to diversify across 60+ originators and 33 countries, so a single bad originator doesn’t torpedo your portfolio. On Twino, your returns are tied entirely to Fincard’s Polish operation. When that works — as it does now, with Fincard posting EUR 7.91 million in profit in 2024 — the returns are attractive. But you’re making a single-country, single-originator bet.

Regulation and Safety

Both platforms are genuinely regulated, which puts them ahead of many European P2P platforms. This is one of the few areas where Twino truly stands alongside Mintos.

Mintos obtained its investment firm license in 2021 and operates under the MiFID II framework with an EUR 20,000 investor protection scheme. Investments are structured as regulated Notes under EU securities law. In February 2026, Mintos announced it’s pursuing a full banking license in Latvia — a step that would allow deposit accounts and other banking services. If successful, this would make Mintos the most regulated platform in the European P2P space by a significant margin.

Twino holds an investment brokerage license from the Latvian Financial and Capital Market Commission (FCMC), also under MiFID II. The regulatory framework is real: capital adequacy requirements (Twino reports 202%), mandatory financial reporting, and proper oversight. When you invest on Twino, you’re buying asset-backed securities, same as on Mintos.

Where they diverge is track record under regulation. Mintos has navigated its challenges (originator defaults, COVID) while maintaining regulatory compliance and growing. Twino’s regulated period has coincided with its most turbulent years — frozen Russian funds, Vietnam losses, four CEOs in five years. Regulation didn’t prevent those problems; it just means there’s oversight on how they’re being resolved.

Both platforms are meaningfully safer than unregulated P2P platforms like PeerBerry from a structural perspective. The MiFID II framework is a genuine differentiator in European P2P investing.

Diversification

This is where the comparison becomes lopsided.

Mintos offers 60+ loan originators across 33+ countries, spanning mortgage loans, car loans, business loans, short-term consumer loans, agricultural loans, invoice financing, and BNPL products. No other European P2P platform comes close to this breadth. You can build a portfolio that spreads risk across dozens of originators, countries, currencies, and loan types. If one originator fails — and several have over the years — your overall portfolio absorbs the hit.

Twino offers loans from one originator (Fincard) in one country (Poland). That’s it. The geographic diversification that once included Russia, Vietnam, Philippines, Georgia, and Kazakhstan is gone. If you invest on Twino today, you’re making a concentrated bet on Polish consumer lending through a single company.

Fincard is profitable (EUR 7.91 million in 2024) and the underlying loan performance is strong. But concentration risk is concentration risk. A regulatory change in Poland — and there’s genuine reason for concern with the CCD2 directive expected in November 2026 — could impact the entire platform.

Twino has plans to expand into the Czech Republic and Romania by 2027, which would help. But those are plans, not reality. Right now, it’s Poland or nothing.

Beyond loans, Mintos also offers fractional bonds, ETFs, and real estate investments. Twino is developing a FLEXI product (a 6% liquidity product similar to Bondora’s Go & Grow, launching mid-2026), but for now, it’s a pure consumer loan platform.

Ease of Use and Features

Mintos is the more feature-rich platform. Custom strategies with granular control over originator selection, loan type, geography, duration, and risk score. Core Loans for a hands-off experience. A liquid secondary market (0.85% fee). Real estate investments. Fractional bonds. ETFs. The platform has evolved from a P2P marketplace into a multi-asset investment platform.

The trade-off is complexity. Setting up an optimal custom strategy on Mintos requires research — evaluating loan originators by risk score, profitability, and track record. The platform provides tools for this (risk scores, originator profiles), but it’s work that not every investor wants to do. Core Loans solves this for hands-off investors, but you give up control.

Twino is simpler by default — Polish consumer loans at ~12% with a buyback guarantee. Set auto-invest and let it run. Both have secondary markets, though Twino’s is much smaller.

For investors who want power and options, Mintos is the clear choice. For straightforward loan investing without the overhead, Twino’s narrower focus is an advantage.

Fees

Twino charges no fees whatsoever. No management fees, no deposit fees, no withdrawal fees, no secondary market fees. For a MiFID II regulated platform, that’s notable.

Mintos has introduced fees over the past two years. Custom Loan Portfolios carry a 0.29% annual fee since May 2025. The High-Yield Bonds Portfolio has a 0.39% annual management fee. And the secondary market charges 0.85% per transaction.

On a EUR 50,000 portfolio at 12% returns, Mintos’s 0.29% annual fee costs EUR 145 per year. The secondary market fee only applies when you sell. These costs are reasonable for what Mintos offers, but they add up over time — especially when a regulated competitor charges nothing.

That said, fees alone shouldn’t drive the decision. Mintos’s diversification, liquidity, and feature set justify a premium. But if you’re cost-sensitive and Twino’s risk profile fits your portfolio, the fee advantage is real.

Platform Health and Stability

This is where the conversation gets honest, and where Twino has the most ground to make up.

Mintos is profitable, employs 160+ people across four offices, manages EUR 800 million+ in assets, and has a banking license application in progress. The platform carries roughly EUR 130 million in unresolved originator defaults from past failures, but the business itself is healthy and growing.

Twino’s platform entity posted a modest profit of EUR 362,000 in 2024 after essentially breaking even in 2023. The underlying Fincard operation is solidly profitable, but the platform layer runs on thin margins. Four CEO changes in five years raises questions, though the current CEO, Nauris Bloks, is improving transparency noticeably.

The legacy issues — EUR 1.9 million frozen in Russia, EUR 1.6 million likely lost in Vietnam, EUR 1.8 million in Ventures wind-down — continue to weigh on reputation. Mintos’s scale absorbs its losses more easily; Twino’s smaller size means similar-magnitude problems hit harder.

Who Should Choose Which?

Choose Mintos if you:

• Want maximum diversification across originators, countries, and loan types
• Value the most advanced regulatory framework in European P2P (MiFID II + pending banking license)
• Need strong liquidity (large secondary market)
• Want to invest beyond loans (bonds, ETFs, real estate)
• Are building a P2P portfolio of EUR 20,000+ and want to spread risk widely
• Prefer a platform with a long, proven profitability record

Choose Twino if you:

• Want zero-fee investing under MiFID II regulation
• Are comfortable with a concentrated bet on Polish consumer lending
• Appreciate the improving transparency under new leadership
• Want to keep your P2P allocation simple (one country, one originator, ~12%)
• Are interested in the upcoming FLEXI liquidity product (6%, launching mid-2026)
• Are looking for a secondary allocation alongside a more diversified primary platform

Use both if: You want exposure to Polish consumer loans at 12% (Twino) alongside broader European diversification (Mintos). Using both provides genuine platform-level diversification, and since both are MiFID II regulated, you maintain regulatory protection across your entire allocation. Keep Mintos as the core holding and Twino as a satellite position.

Verdict

Mintos wins this comparison in almost every category. The diversification, scale, regulatory trajectory (banking license), multi-asset capabilities, and proven profitability put it in a different league. It is the most complete P2P investment platform in Europe, and it’s the one I trust with my largest allocation (EUR 150,000+).

Twino has a more specific appeal. The zero-fee MiFID II regulated structure is attractive, the Polish lending arm is genuinely strong, and under Nauris Bloks the platform is showing signs of a real turnaround. But the recent history — Russia, Vietnam, Ventures, leadership turnover — means you’re betting on a platform that’s still proving it can deliver consistent results post-crisis.

For most investors, Mintos should be the primary platform and Twino a supplementary allocation if you’re comfortable with the risks. If Twino executes on its expansion plans (Czech Republic, Romania) and the FLEXI product, this comparison could look different in a year or two. For now, Mintos is the clear first choice.

Read my full Mintos review and Twino review for more detail. You might also find my Mintos vs PeerBerry comparison useful, along with my best European P2P lending platforms guide and my complete guide to P2P lending.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are both Mintos and Twino regulated?

Yes. Both platforms hold investment firm licenses under the MiFID II framework in Latvia. Mintos is also pursuing a full banking license. This level of regulation puts both ahead of many European P2P platforms that operate without MiFID II or ECSP licensing.

What happened to Twino’s Russian loans?

When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, EU sanctions and Russian capital controls froze approximately EUR 6.8 million in investor funds on Twino. By January 2026, this had been reduced to about EUR 1.9 million. Twino has offered affected investors a buyback deal: 80% of remaining capital plus 100% of accrued interest.

Which platform has better returns?

Both advertise ~12% on current loan offerings. Over the long term, my personal net return on Mintos has averaged ~9% after accounting for originator defaults over 9 years. Twino’s returns have been competitive when the platform was operating normally, but losses from Russia and Vietnam have impacted overall returns for longer-term investors.

Is Twino too risky in 2026?

Twino carries more risk than Mintos due to single-country concentration (Poland), regulatory arbitrage around the Polish P2P ban, and a recent history of operational problems. However, the Polish lending arm (Fincard) is profitable (EUR 7.91M in 2024), the platform is MiFID II regulated, and the new CEO is improving transparency. It’s not too risky for a modest allocation, but it shouldn’t be your only P2P platform.

Does Mintos charge fees?

Yes. Since May 2025, Mintos charges 0.29% annually on Custom Loan Portfolios. The secondary market carries a 0.85% transaction fee. The High-Yield Bonds Portfolio has a 0.39% annual fee. Twino charges zero fees. While Mintos’s fees are reasonable for the features offered, the cost difference is real.

Can I invest in real estate on both platforms?

Mintos offers real estate investments starting from EUR 50, with secondary market liquidity. Twino Ventures (its former real estate product) is being wound down after underperformance and is no longer accepting new investments. However, Twino is launching a FLEXI liquidity product (6% with daily withdrawals) in mid-2026, aimed at a different market segment.

Open a Mintos account Open a Twino account

Related

Mintos Review 2026 – My Results in 9 Years and Over €150,000 Invested

Twino Review 2026 – A P2P Platform in Transition

Mintos vs Robocash — Which Is Better in 2026?

Mintos vs Bondora — Which Is Better in 2026?

Mintos vs Esketit — Which Is Better in 2026?

Mintos vs ViaInvest — Which Is Better in 2026?