Contents

I’ve been investing in P2P lending since 2016. Over that time I’ve put real money into more than a dozen platforms, watched several fail, and seen others grow into properly regulated businesses that now manage hundreds of millions in investor assets.
The market looks very different in 2026 than it did when I started. Three platforms now hold MiFID II investment firm licenses, the strongest financial regulation available for this asset class in Europe. Several more operate under the EU’s ECSP crowdfunding framework. The platforms that survived the pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and the interest rate shock of 2022-2023 have proven something about their operational resilience.
Below are the platforms I currently consider the best options for European investors. I’ve invested in most of them personally. This is not a list of every platform that exists. I also maintain a list of platforms I’d avoid.
Best European P2P Lending Platforms in 2026
- Mintos — read my review
- PeerBerry — read my review
- ViaInvest — read my review
- Debitum — read my review
- InRento — read my review
- Swaper — read my review
- RoboCash — read my review
- LANDE — read my review
- Hive5 — read my review
- Bondora — read my review
Quick Comparison
| Platform | Score | Regulation | Returns | Lifetime Volume | Founded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mintos | 4.5/5 | MiFID II | 11-12% | EUR 12.3B | 2015 |
| PeerBerry | 4.3/5 | Unregulated | 10-11% | EUR 3.24B | 2017 |
| ViaInvest | 4.0/5 | MiFID II | 12-13% | EUR 618M | 2016 |
| Debitum | 4.2/5 | MiFID II + ECSP | 9-12% | EUR 135M | 2018 |
| InRento | 4.5/5 | ECSP | 8-10% | EUR 80M | 2020 |
| Swaper | 4.3/5 | Unregulated | 10-14% | EUR 1.01B | 2016 |
| RoboCash | 4.0/5 | Unregulated | 8-13% | EUR 1.27B | 2017 |
| LANDE | 4.0/5 | ECSP | 10-14% | EUR 32M | 2019 |
| Hive5 | 4.0/5 | Unregulated | 12-15% | EUR 156M | 2022 |
| Bondora | 3.5/5 | Unregulated | 6% (Go & Grow) | EUR 1.9B | 2009 |
Let’s look at each platform in detail.
1. Mintos
Mintos is the largest P2P lending marketplace in Europe and the platform where I’ve put the most capital over the years. Founded in 2015 in Riga, Latvia, it now counts over 500,000 registered investors and has facilitated more than 12 billion euros in loans across 30+ countries. Monthly origination runs around EUR 110 million, which is several times larger than any competitor.
What sets Mintos apart is its regulatory standing. The platform holds an investment firm license from the Latvian Financial and Capital Market Commission (FCMC) and operates under the MiFID II framework. That gives investors real legal protections, not just a buyback guarantee backed by the word of a small loan originator. In February 2026, Mintos announced it is pursuing a full banking license in Latvia. Returns currently average around 11-12% annually, with loan originators across more than 30 countries and a secondary market where you can exit positions if needed.
Since May 2025, Mintos charges a 0.29% annual fee on Custom Loan Portfolios, and the new High-Yield Bonds Portfolio (launched November 2025) carries a 0.39% annual management fee. The platform also carries EUR 130 million in unresolved defaults from past loan originators, which is why the re:think P2P community gives it a C grade despite its scale. Those defaults are a legacy issue rather than a current trend, but they’re worth noting.
See also: My full Mintos review
2. PeerBerry
PeerBerry launched in 2017 and has become the second-largest European P2P platform by lifetime volume, with over EUR 3.24 billion in loans funded and more than 110,000 registered investors. Monthly origination runs around EUR 31 million, though volume dropped roughly 47% year-on-year in 2025. That decline is worth monitoring, though it may reflect tighter lending standards rather than underlying problems.
PeerBerry’s most impressive achievement: it was the only P2P platform to fully repay investors affected by loans tied to war-impacted regions, returning all EUR 51.4 million without a single euro under recovery. That kind of follow-through matters when you’re evaluating who to trust with your money. The platform launched a secondary market in January 2026, works with 28 loan originators across 13 countries, and average returns sit around 11%.
PeerBerry is not regulated under MiFID II or ECSP at the platform level, though its sister platform Crowdpear holds an ECSP license. For investors who prioritize scale and track record over regulatory framework, PeerBerry is a strong pick.
See also: My full PeerBerry review
3. ViaInvest
ViaInvest won the re:think P2P community vote for 2025 with 53.8% of votes, beating out every other European P2P platform. That kind of grassroots endorsement from active investors carries more weight than any marketing claim.
Founded in 2016 in Latvia, ViaInvest holds a MiFID II investment firm license from the FCMC. Over 46,000 investors have used the platform, and lifetime volume sits at EUR 618 million with monthly origination of EUR 11-14 million. Returns average around 13%, which is among the highest of any MiFID II regulated platform. The parent company VIA SMS Group has been profitable for multiple years.
ViaInvest focuses primarily on short-term consumer loans (typically 30 days) with a buyback obligation. The combination of proper regulation, strong returns, and a profitable parent company makes it one of the most compelling platforms in the market right now. The re:think P2P community rates it a B grade (11/15).
See also: My full ViaInvest review
4. Debitum
Debitum (rebranded to Debitum Investments in February 2024) focuses exclusively on business loans: secured, collateralized, and backed by tangible assets. It’s been operating since 2018 and saw strong growth in 2025, with the portfolio nearly doubling to over EUR 53 million and the platform achieving its first year of profitability. Lifetime volume sits at EUR 135 million across 24,000 investors.
Debitum holds both a MiFID II investment firm license and an ECSP license from the Latvian FCMC, making it one of the most thoroughly regulated platforms on this list. Returns average 9-12% annually with a 90-day buyback guarantee. There’s a 15% penalty applied to loan originators who delay repayments, which creates a real incentive for originators to stay current.
If you want exposure to SME lending with a proper regulatory backstop, Debitum is worth a close look. The re:think P2P community rates it B+ (12/15), second only to Nectaro.
See also: My full Debitum review
5. InRento
InRento is a real estate rental investment platform that lets you invest in properties generating actual rental income rather than development loans. Founded in 2020 in Lithuania, it holds an ECSP license from the Bank of Lithuania and has funded over EUR 80 million across properties in Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Ireland, and Spain.
What makes InRento stand out is its 0% default rate. Every project on the platform has paid as expected, which is a genuinely remarkable track record in a sector where real estate platforms have been dropping like flies (EstateGuru, Reinvest24, Bulkestate all collapsed). Returns range from 8-10% annually from rental yields, with some capital appreciation on top. The minimum investment is EUR 500, and investors receive monthly rental income distributions.
The model is fundamentally different from most P2P platforms: instead of short-term consumer loans with buyback guarantees, you’re investing in actual properties with real tenants paying real rent. That’s a different risk profile, and I’d argue a more tangible one. InRento is expanding into new European markets, which should provide more diversification options going forward.
See also: My full InRento review
6. Swaper
Swaper has been running since 2016 and has now passed EUR 1 billion in total funded loan volume, with around 10,000 investors on the platform and monthly origination of roughly EUR 25 million. It offers short-term consumer loans from originators operating in Spain, Estonia, North Macedonia, and Peru, plus business loans through the newly launched SW Finance OU (established December 2024 with an Estonian FIU license). Interest rates range from 10-14% depending on loan type and geography, with a VIP tier offering higher rates for portfolios above EUR 25,000. The buyback guarantee activates after 60 days.
Effective yields land closer to 10-12% in practice once you account for cash drag. The team navigated the pandemic and the 2022 geopolitical disruption without losses to investors, which deserves credit. The platform is simple by design: there’s no secondary market, so you commit capital until loans mature. Swaper is not regulated under MiFID II or ECSP, though it operates under Estonian law.
See also: My full Swaper review
7. RoboCash
RoboCash has been running since 2017 and is fully automated by design. You set your parameters and the platform handles everything from loan selection to reinvestment. The platform is backed by UnaFinancial (formerly Robocash Group), a consumer finance company with operations across Southeast Asia and Europe. Over 41,000 investors have used the platform, total funded volume has passed EUR 1.27 billion, and monthly origination runs around EUR 21 million.
Returns range from 8-13% annually, with all loans covered by a 30-day buyback guarantee, the shortest buyback window on this list. However, recent analysis has flagged concerns about UnaFinancial’s balance sheet: the debt-to-equity ratio surged to approximately 25x in 2024, with the company losing over half its equity in one year. Some recovery has been seen in 2025, with the group actively reducing debt, but this is worth monitoring. A strong parent is what gives buyback guarantees their actual value, and that equation has become less clear-cut.
See also: My full RoboCash review
8. LANDE
LANDE occupies a niche that no other platform on this list touches: agricultural loans for farmers in Eastern Europe, secured by first-rank mortgages on farmland and agricultural assets. Founded in 2019 in Latvia (originally as LendSecured), the platform holds an ECSP license, has over 8,500 investors, and has funded more than EUR 32 million in loans.
Returns range from 10-14% annually. The collateral structure is extremely conservative, with an average loan-to-value ratio around 37%. All loans carry first-rank mortgage security, meaning LANDE investors sit ahead of everyone else in the repayment queue in the event of default. To date there have been zero capital losses for investors. LANDE also invests its own capital alongside investors in every project, which aligns incentives properly.
The monthly volume is modest (around EUR 1 million), reflecting the niche agricultural focus. That’s not a weakness. It’s a platform that does one thing well rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
See also: My full LANDE review
9. Hive5
Hive5 launched in 2022 and has grown fast. It’s incorporated in Croatia and operates primarily out of Vilnius, Lithuania. The platform now has over 28,000 investors with more than EUR 156 million in loans funded and monthly origination of EUR 6-8 million.
Returns sit at the higher end of what’s available: 12-15% annually, with all loans covered by a buyback obligation if a payment is delayed beyond 60 days. The minimum investment is EUR 10 and the interface is clean and straightforward.
One caveat: Hive5 is not regulated by a financial authority, and it operates from Croatia where platforms can argue legal exemption from the ECSP framework. There’s also structural overlap between the platform and some of its loan originators, which is a concentration risk you should weigh up. The higher returns reflect higher risk.
See also: My full Hive5 review
10. Bondora
Bondora is one of the oldest platforms in European P2P lending, founded in 2009 in Estonia. I’ve been investing there since 2016. The platform’s flagship product, Go & Grow, offers a fixed 6% return with daily liquidity, which makes it the most conservative option on this list. It set all-time deposit records in December 2025 (EUR 46.7 million in a single month) and is approaching 500,000 investors with nearly EUR 1.9 billion in total investments.
Bondora has been profitable for eight consecutive years, a statement very few platforms in this space can make. Go & Grow appeals to investors who want simplicity and liquidity at the cost of a lower yield. If you want higher returns, the standard portfolio products are still available but require more active management. Either way, Bondora’s longevity and profitability make it one of the most credible operators in the market.
See also: My full Bondora review
Also Worth Considering
These platforms didn’t make the top 10 but are legitimate options worth evaluating depending on your priorities.
Income Marketplace (score: 3.8/5) offers around 13% returns with an innovative “junior share” mechanism where loan originators absorb the first losses before investors take any hit. Lifetime volume sits at EUR 201 million. The platform is unregulated and still doesn’t have a secondary market, but the structural protections are among the best in the industry. Read my review.
Fintown (score: 4.0/5) is a Czech real estate platform focused on AirBnB apartments in Prague. The niche is interesting and the platform has funded around EUR 24 million. It’s unregulated and small, so treat it as a satellite allocation rather than a core holding. Read my review.
Monefit SmartSaver (score: 3.5/5) offers a savings-like product with 7-10% returns backed by Creditstar Group’s consumer lending portfolio. With over 30,000 investors and EUR 302 million in assets, it’s a simple option for investors who want P2P-level returns without managing individual loans. The parent company Creditstar is a well-established lender, though the product itself is not separately regulated. Read my review.
Lonvest (score: 4.1/5) launched in 2023 and targets up to 13% returns with a 60-day buyback guarantee. It’s connected to the UnaFinancial ecosystem (same parent as RoboCash) and is expanding into Mexico. At only EUR 1.6 million in lifetime volume and roughly 600 investors, it’s still very early stage. The signals are positive but treat it as a small speculative allocation. Read my review.
Platforms to Watch
Two platforms I don’t yet have full reviews for but that deserve attention based on independent data.
Nectaro was the clear standout of 2025. It holds an investment firm license from the Latvian FCMC (same regulator as Mintos, ViaInvest, and Debitum), earned an A- grade from re:think P2P (the highest of any platform), delivered 14.91% actual returns in 2025, and has zero defaults. Lifetime volume has reached EUR 47 million with investor numbers growing 323% year-on-year. I plan to write a full review.
Afranga obtained its ECSP license in 2025 and earned a B+ grade from re:think P2P alongside Debitum. It delivered 13.92% returns in 2025 with zero reported defaults and has funded over EUR 107 million since launching in 2021. The platform is undergoing a transition as it adapts to its new regulatory requirements.
Understanding Regulation
Regulation has become the single most important differentiator between P2P platforms. Here’s what the three tiers mean in practice.
MiFID II (strongest): Platforms holding an investment firm license under MiFID II are supervised by the same financial regulators that oversee banks and brokerages. Investors benefit from the EUR 20,000 compensation scheme, mandatory capital adequacy requirements, and proper complaint resolution mechanisms. Only three platforms hold this: Mintos, ViaInvest, and Debitum.
ECSP (good): The European Crowdfunding Service Provider regulation provides a pan-EU framework for crowdfunding platforms. It’s less comprehensive than MiFID II but still requires regulatory authorization, key investment information sheets, and investor protection measures. Platforms with ECSP licenses include Debitum, LANDE, and InRento.
Unregulated (higher risk): Several popular platforms operate without specific financial regulation, often from jurisdictions like Croatia or Estonia where they can argue legal exemption. These platforms may still be trustworthy, but you’re relying entirely on the platform’s goodwill and track record rather than regulatory backstops. PeerBerry, Swaper, RoboCash, Hive5, and Bondora fall into this category.
Who Can Invest?
All platforms listed here accept investors from across the European Union. Most also accept investors from non-EU European countries. If you’re based outside Europe, some platforms will still accept you. Check each platform’s registration flow for current eligibility rules.
What Returns Can Investors Realistically Expect?
In 2026, realistic net returns on well-managed P2P portfolios across European platforms fall in the 8-12% range. That’s after accounting for cash drag, occasional defaulted loans, and any platform-level risks that materialize.
That range is worth contextualizing. European savings rates have risen from near zero to somewhere in the 2-4% range for short-term deposits, depending on the bank and country. High-yield bond ETFs yield 5-7%. P2P lending still offers a meaningful premium over both, but the spread has compressed compared to the 2015-2021 period when bank savings paid essentially nothing.
The platforms advertising 14-16% headline rates tend to have higher underlying risk, shorter track records, or significant cash drag that eats into effective yields. I don’t chase the top of that range. The platforms I weight most heavily in my own portfolio target 10-12%, with strong regulatory standing and multiple years of clean track record behind them.
Risks of P2P Lending
P2P lending is an alternative investment with real risks. Platform failure, loan originator default, liquidity risk, and regulatory change can all affect your returns or your ability to access your capital at all. Buyback guarantees protect against individual borrower defaults but not against the insolvency of the loan originator making that guarantee.
The European market has lost multiple platforms in recent years: Grupeer turned out to be a scam, Crowdestor defaulted on 67-80% of its portfolio, Reinvest24 collapsed with 100% of funds in recovery, and EstateGuru has 62% of its portfolio under recovery with EUR 133 million in defaults. These are not edge cases. They represent a meaningful portion of the platforms that existed five years ago.
I’ve written a detailed guide on whether P2P lending is safe that covers these risks properly. Read it before you invest.
Alternatives to P2P Lending
If you want to diversify your alternative investment allocation beyond P2P loans, European real estate crowdfunding platforms are the most natural complement. They typically offer similar yield ranges backed by property assets rather than consumer or business loans. The liquidity profile is different (terms tend to be longer) but the collateral quality can be higher.
For a more conservative allocation, Bondora’s Go & Grow or Monefit SmartSaver bridge the gap between savings accounts and higher-risk P2P, offering 6-10% with simpler, more liquid products.
Conclusion
If you’re new to P2P lending and want to start somewhere sensible, I’d suggest opening accounts with Mintos and ViaInvest first. Both hold MiFID II licenses, have real scale, and have survived multiple market disruptions. From there, diversifying across two or three additional platforms reduces your single-platform concentration risk.
If you want to understand how P2P lending works before committing money, my ultimate guide to P2P lending covers the mechanics in depth. And if you’re still on the fence about whether the asset class makes sense for you, I’ve written a straightforward breakdown of why you should (or shouldn’t) invest in P2P lending.
Before you invest, make sure you understand how P2P income is taxed in your country. I’ve written about how P2P lending is taxed in Spain, which may be useful if you’re a Spanish resident.
Have you invested in any of these platforms? What has your experience been? Leave a comment below.








It’s great to see a detailed focus on accessible European platforms with impressive earning potential. Looking forward to exploring these options for global investors
I stumbled upon another platform that claims to make the process safer by making loan originators hold a 20% junior share of each loan. It’s a very new platform with only 4 loan originators: Income Marketplace.
What do you think about it? Any red flags? Is there any potential? Is what they are doing just standard practice instead of bringing something new?
It is a newer platform but it’s growing fast. I plan to do a deep dive on this platform soon and will post the full review here.
Hi Jean,
Really interesting and useful information. I’ve also read your articles on passive income from crypto. Living in the UK some of these platforms require EU bank accounts and are only accepting investors from EEA countries. Since the end of the transition period UK is not an EEA participant. Others it seems still allow UK investors. Could you comment on your understanding of which platforms are still allowing UK investors?
Regards Paul
Hi Paul, check out this article about the best P2P lending platforms in the UK specifically. I haven’t checked all the European platforms lately for UK investor eligibility unfortunately so I cannot tell you offhand which ones of those are still accepting UK investors. I would imagine that most of them will eventually want to allow UK investors if they don’t already do so.
Hi Jean,
I am afraid Mintos are not offering their signup bonus anymore…
Take care,
Min
I am using Mintos for 2 months and i like it a lot! Good return and no risks (i am just using conservative strategy). The only concern to put a lot of money (>100k) on the platform if they would go bankrupt. What would happen in this case ? The loans are still there when this happens.
In parallel i selected now ViVentor to balance this risk.
Spreading the risk around 2/3 platforms is a good idea Hubert. I don’t have much concerns about Mintos going bankrupt; they are currently crowdfunding but they already have sufficient funds to have no trouble going forward.
If Mintos go bankrupt the investor would still be contractually bound to the borrower and thus he would still be owed the principal and interest. An administrator would be put in place and it would be his responsibility to collect the pending loans. There are precedents to such a situation – I have gone through this process with the UK platform Lendy, which went bankrupt in 2018. Grupeer is also going through a similar process, although there are lots of suspicions around that platform in particular.
I am interested in finding new P2P lending services in Europe that I can use completely free of the need to use a mobile phone. I use Flender (and CapitalAssetz) for example but in contrast I have now received definitive information from Bondora, by further example, that it is not possible with them. One of the frustrating things is that companies seem so reluctant to just say no which would be fine by me but want to lead you down the garden path of what they do offer and inviting you to read about their services when all I want is a yes or no on that simple question. Any good ideas?
I think Mintos can be used without the need of a smartphone.
Do you know of any peer-to-peer platform that loans to individuals and not loan sharks? More out of idealistic thinking of taking out the middle men (banks)?
The people who are being serviced by the P2P lending platforms are typically not able to get loans from the banks for some reason or another, so in my view we are not taking out the banks by investing in P2P lending.
Perhaps you might take a look at DeFi crypto lending, although it’s still in the very early stages.
Thank you for sharing information!😍😍😚😚